/me looks at Mu: "fuiste tu, no cabron?"--------------
"It was you, wasnt it cabron?"
Mira STEPHAN yo simplemente puse un link a un RSS feed de macnn que decia "quad pentiums" no es mi culpa que un ignorante puso eso en macnn (un lugar donde yo creo cada noticia que dan). Mkay? Mkay.
___________
"look sephy boy, i just posted a link to a rss feed at macnn that said quad pentiums...yadda yadda, i plead the 5th yadda, mkay? mkay. 
Aqua-Soft, donde puedes venir a aprender de windows/macs/español e ingles, generalmente en el mismo post
------------------
Aqua-Soft where you can come to learn about windows/macs/spanish and english, more often than not from the same POST *
____________
* no, not that kind of post, smartasses
Awww crap this is horrible.this is as if the pope switched to budhisim.
And you are sooooooo annoying!
It`s usualy people who know least that b1tch most :slant:
What the hell is your problem with Intel?
This is the greatest move Apple can make... Im puchasing whatever comes first out of the PowerMac or PowerBook and I cant wait to get my hands on it to see what it can do. Apple had no other choice the future of PPC is pretty much non-existant, you say your a fan of Apple so why do you want them to stick with old architecture and put themselves out of business?
He doesnt even know what he is talking about - let him whine and cry. Its sad, yes... But his ignorance on the implications of both processor architecture paths is just uncanny
*ba-dum-psh*Awww crap this is horrible.this is as if the pope switched to budhisim.
(everyone's a comedian)
I noticed that Photoshop CS2 started a little slow. It starts faster on my Athlon 2500 with 512 MB of RAM (certainly slower than a 3.6 GHz P4 with 1 Gig) but it was running on Rosetta. Either way, I trust Apple. I think the move is a good one because the new Intel architecture will allow easier porting from Win to Mac, and will allow more developers to begin developing apps for Mac, quicker, easier, and cheaper.
i think it's a good thing too, cuz it will force software programmers to actually optimize their code due to competition from a different os utilizing the same chip, etc.
I noticed that Photoshop CS2 started a little slow. It starts faster on my Athlon 2500 with 512 MB of RAM (certainly slower than a 3.6 GHz P4 with 1 Gig) but it was running on Rosetta. Either way, I trust Apple. I think the move is a good one because the new Intel architecture will allow easier porting from Win to Mac, and will allow more developers to begin developing apps for Mac, quicker, easier, and cheaper.
I quote what I just said (just take out the harshness in your case):
Hobbes, that's the second time you've said that.Let me put it this way for you.
Steve running that MAC VERSION OF PHOTOSHOP on an INTEL BASED MACHINE would be like trying to run XBox games on a Mac, and succeeding at 80% speed.
That version of photoshop was NOT PORTED TO INTEL! It was EMULATED!
It's like running photoshop through PearPC. It's already AMAZING that it booted up as fast as it did.
Well to be fair its not actually emulation. Its code manipulation to make it run natively with rosetta in the bg. Thats the point if it was emulation it would be like running it in VPC. That is why its AMAZING that it booted up so fast yes there is slight lag from rosetta but not much.
The fact is its fast shockingly fast, thats why it got applause from a room full of developers who know what they're looking at. The fact is no-one knows what that photoshop was running and no-one can compare it to any system on the market today its all designed for systems we will see in 12 months.
Well it's effectively a code translation system, which is effectively emulation, if on a higher level.
Aqua-Soft Forums