[offtopic] New Encryption I Dreamed Up

Originally posted by Ludge@Nov 25 2003, 10:22 AM

Oh for crying out loud! This is embarrasing to read. Listen closely.

What's embarrasing to read?

What I've been saying, or the whole "what's made of what" business? <_<

#82611

Stevie, yes, quantum computers rely on the basics of the qubit being in all of its states in either point of time and strying to stabilise it by conceptual normal means (ie just plain holding it to one state) would just not be possible becasue photosns move away when they are tried to be held, im talking about entanglement of the qubits... (but from here its just gets weird!!, a qubit could hold answers to every single question in 1000 of differnet parallel universes for example!... i love this concepts that quantum physics are alloing us to have ;))

#82612

Originally posted by Stevie BM@Nov 25 2003, 09:25 AM

What's embarrasing to read?

What I've been saying, or the whole "what's made of what" business?  <_<

Sorry, I meant the "atoms are made of photons" business. Your quantumn encryption is interesting stuff. Hadn't heard of it before

#82615

Um I think this got off topic of the off topic topic.

But I think that I have learned all that I wanted and more, thank you very much for all of your help, it has been most enlightening.

Also sort of to do with Quantumn Physics, has anyone read this great book: Timeline?

p.s. Anyone avaliable to give me some free one to one lessons on Quantum Physics?

Edit: Spelling don't want to be caught out for that in one of the most highly thinking topics I have bought to this board.

#82616

Originally posted by WhiteDove@Nov 25 2003, 10:41 AM

Um I think this got off topic of the off topic topic.

But I think that I have learned all that I wanted and more, thank you very much for all of your help, it has been most enlightening.

Also sort of to do with Quantumn Physics, has anyone read this great book: Timeline?

p.s. Anyone avadiable to give me some free one to one lessons on Quantum Physics?

I think the off-topicness was Seph and my fault...

If you want info Quantum computing (by not much on the related physics), I've got some decent URLs... PM me if you want 'em...

#82618

/me lowers his head and asks for apologies for being so delightfully offtopic

#82619

Originally posted by Ludge@Nov 25 2003, 10:22 AM

Atoms are made of protons and neutrons with electrons spinning around the outside.

You should realise, that however right you may think you are, theres always going to be someone about who can tell you you're wrong. :P

Whitedove... i can tell you lots of stuff, though my knowledge on q-mechanics is slightly blurry.... its always a 9am lecture. I do usually get paid for tutoring though... kerching!

parallel universes don't exist

#82667

Man I have loved reading this thread... don't stop... more! :D

#82672

Err, I'm getting things mixed up again! :nuts: I meant quarks. Quarks make up subatomic particles. I'm sorry. You are right :nuts: I need a vacation!

#82681

Originally posted by Ludge@Nov 25 2003, 04:22 AM

Atoms are made of protons and neutrons with electrons spinning around the outside.

How about:

"Molecules are made of atoms (protons and neutrons with electrons spinning around the outside.)"

Don't talk about embarrassment until you typo-check your own work. :P

-=edit=- didn't notice fissy also sorta pointed that out. :P -=/edit=-

#82716

Originally posted by wizard@Nov 25 2003, 08:08 AM

Quarks make up subatomic particles.

that's right! what's interesting is, the word "quark" was taken from the book finnegan's wake. :smartass:

#82720

Originally posted by dreamz@Nov 25 2003, 11:30 AM

that's right!  what's interesting is, the word "quark" was taken from the book finnegan's wake. :smartass:

Aw, I was hoping it was after the ferengi bartender. :(

#82726

OK, OK, so I made a typo. But hey. At least two of you know what I meant! And I am right that they aren't made of photons!

EDIT: unless you want to get right down to the nitty gritty energy has mass and mass is energy stuff that I don't even want to understand.

#82738

Y`all geeks :6

#82782

No chip, not me

#82786

Originally posted by Chip@Nov 25 2003, 09:41 PM

Y`all geeks :6

You say that as if it's a bad thing <_<

#82813

Gosh, some people... cant you see im a Wabbit Teeth Geek? im no plain geek

#82818

wow.. that's quite a thread..

not to get of the wonderful topic of Quantum Computing..

but does anyone think we'll ever see computers running on the same idea of the Infinite Improbability Drive?

ahh.. the Intel XXXXII Infinite Improbability Processor. that would be one heck of a fast computer.. :D

#82831

I prefer bistromathics to the infinite improbability drive

#82832

Originally posted by Ludge@Nov 25 2003, 05:05 PM

I prefer bistromathics to the infinite improbability drive

bistromathics is quite a bit more advanced than infinite improbability.

#82834

The problem is that they all suffer from the occasionall Out Of Cheese error.

#82835

Originally posted by Stevie BM@Nov 25 2003, 05:10 PM

The problem is that they all suffer from the occasionall Out Of Cheese error.

actually, instead of the normal BSOD, that you get with windows..

your tower and monitor would, upon crashing, turn into a bowl of petunias

and a sperm whale.

#82838

Originally posted by Sid@Nov 24 2003, 03:04 PM

Any idea how many fps I'll get in Quake 3 on that quantum machine thingy?

ROOOOOOFL!!

I was wondering about that myself :blink:

#82937

Wabbit Teeth Geek not plain geek

LoL that`s funny :lol:

#83174