Which Linux?

I have 3 CDs left and want to get off this windows sh##e. I am new to linux but i do have a book about it and have been doing some reading. I am basically pinned between:

Red Hat 9

or

Mandrake 9.1

I am going to dualboot with XP so im not totally abandoning MS.. :P anyway i really want to try this complete gnome OSX makeover too so im not sure which one supports it

Peace!

Steve

#57402

Originally posted by StevenapeX@Sep 19 2003, 08:20 PM

I have 3 CDs left and want to get off this windows sh##e. I am new to linux but i do have a book about it and have been doing some reading. I am basically pinned between:

Red Hat 9

or

Mandrake 9.1

I am going to dualboot with XP so im not totally abandoning MS..  :P  anyway i really want to try this complete gnome OSX makeover too so im not sure which one supports it

Peace!

Steve

Both support it, as both include Gnome as an option when you install it. I don't know which to recommend to you, but I'll go ahead and say Mandrake. They really are pretty much the same thing anyway in my opinion.

#57403

why not wait until the release of Mandrake 9.2.

Its supposed to be great.

#57409

mandrake is great, but redhat is more versitile....and more ppl use it, which means more support....ie less compiling.

#57410

"Versitile"? Hardly. There is nothing better about Redhat, they just have good support.

Id go with Mandrake 9.2, its gonna be out a couple weeks.

#57430

hmm

do u think this is mandrake 9.2

MandrakeLinux-9.2rc2-CD1.i586.iso

i'm getting off the official ftp site for penn state students

i know just cause it says that its 9.2 doesn't mean anything but...

#57446

Originally posted by idicula@Sep 19 2003, 10:51 PM

hmm

do u think this is mandrake 9.2

MandrakeLinux-9.2rc2-CD1.i586.iso

i'm getting off the official ftp site for penn state students

i know just cause it says that its 9.2 doesn't mean anything but...

it says rc2, which means release candidate 2. Or in other words, a beta. And having a beta version of an OS is maybe not the best idea.

I would also go for Mandrake, i have had best experiences with that distro :)

#57447

using 9.2 right seems allright

took a while to load after installation

#57454

but thats Rc2 not the final

and usualy the first load of mandrake is the longest

#57456

Also, turn off all unneeded services.

Check the Mandrake Control Center.

Mandrake/Redhat LOVES to run every server they can at startup, not only is this insecure, but its REALLY slows down your machine.

Turn off Apache, Sendmail, portmap, ssh, etc, and your system will fly (as long as you arent using KDE/GNOME).

#57457

what ever linux distro you see fit

i like Slackware cuz it has the lowest requirements!

#57465

i have decided to use redhat, im TRYING to install an updated GAIM but it keeps asking for a dictionary library file

any thoughts appreceated :boob shake:

ApeX

#57551

You'd have to give us the exact error.

#57624

are you trying to install an rpm or compile it from source?

#57683

I'm actually in the process of finding a "New distro." Unfortuantely, red hat has pissed me off. The fancy "bluecurve" restrctions which are set on the main menu drive me insannnneee!

I've searched and searched and tried to find answers as to how to install gnome as STOCK gnome truly is. However, nobody has been able to help me.

On my test linux machine, I even stripped gnome away, and then did a fresh install using CVSGnome (automated download and compilation of gnome source files), and someone it STILL ended up using the stupid bluecurve/redhat version of gnome!

Bahhhhh!

We'll see what happens. Debian is just slightly too complicated for me at the moment. I'm looking at Gentoo (I have used it extensively in the past, but I always had my linux-guru friend helping me and I've lost touch with him).

#57819

There is a way to make the menus editable again, but I don't know how offhand. If I find the link again, I'll edit this reply. :)

#57841

Originally posted by GreySim@Sep 21 2003, 05:33 AM

There is a way to make the menus editable again, but I don't know how offhand.  If I find the link again, I'll edit this reply.  :)

I've found the How To's and the links in other forums to make the menu editable. I'm just...in the mood for something else. I was pretty turned off that Red Hat made things so "difficult" to change. Honestly, considering Linux is in my opinion one of the most powerful and flexible OSs you can find, I fail to see why Red Hat wouldn't let you edit a *menu*. For cryin' out loud.

Gentoo is probably for me. I've used it before...it's poweful, fast, robust, and super super sweeeeet. (nothin' better than emerge if you ask me!)

:D And since everything is compiled from source...well...:) Yah. ;)

#58067

OK, Yall be needin' ta mosey on down to the ArkLinux website and get some of that nice ArkLinux!

I get Kernel Panic, but it doesnt mean you will, YOU CAN PLAY TETRIS WHILE YOU INSTALL!!!!!!!!!!!!

#58072

Wow I haven't heard of ArkLinux in a very long time!

:)

#58082