Web 2.0 Validator

Is there a site that gets a perfect score on the Web 2.0 validator (http://web2.0validator.com)?

I tried doing everything they suggest on my blog but it only gets 25 out of 52.

You should be honored. The entire concept of "Web 2.0" is a joke.

You should be honored. The entire concept of "Web 2.0" is a joke.

Hmm, why do you say that?

Web 2.0 is a valid phenomenon, but this validator looks to be pretty stupid, in that it doesn't actually "validate" much.

-NC

#438410

Aqua-Soft gets 8/52, same with Apple

M$ gets 5/52

Google gets 2/52..

And I always thought that Web 2.0 was where social-netowrking sites and such take over

//EDIT: One of the rules for being Web 2.0 is being Web 3.0... WTF?

#438428

Hmm, why do you say that?

Because the trend of websites adding RSS feeds and tagging abilities does not an entirely new Web make. It's a marketing term, not a phenomenon to be taken seriously.

The advent of CSS was a bigger deal to the Web than the advent of image tagging on flickr or the change of term from "homepage" to "blog."

#438573

Yeah, you even need adsense to be web 2.0.. That's bullshit!

#438592

Yeah, you even need adsense to be web 2.0.. That's bullshit!

I agree completely. If your site passes every "qualification" (however stupid) of Web 2.0, you must have way too much time on your hands, or a cluttered website. A cluttered website detracts from the whole "user experience", making your site even less Web 2.0 valid than what that validator says. Yeesh.

Last.fm gets an 8

Myspace gets 5

Facebook gets a 6

Skype gets a 4

Digg gets 13

Del.icio.us gets 8

Youtube gets a 6

These are all famous "Web 2.0"-style sites, and none of them make a passing grade (the validator is out of 51 or 52, depending)

#439278