What's everyones take on this little gem?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/04/21/mo...e_for_comments/
What's everyones take on this little gem?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/04/21/mo...e_for_comments/
Well that kinda is the whole purpose of moderators, theyre cyber cops =P
**** that. that's the same law as making the bartender responsible for a patron's drinking. i got two words:
PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY.
know it; use it; love it!
Muahahaha :evil:
while I do agree with shmengie on personal responsibility everyone's view changes depending on experiences, using that analogy kinda misses the point. I've got two unique perspectives on that specific comment from a conviction perspective & from the victim perspective.
When you undertake a job you agree to do it in a certain manner. eg. If you agree with that comment then isn't far to say that police officers should basically fire away with our regard to harming others.
We live in a society that almost celebrates complete abdication of "personal responsibility".
Physical actions & freedom of speech are distinctly different.
nc, what about bribes? didn't timan send a free imac or anything? ![]()