u know it sucks big time,apple give away itunes for fre....which is awesome...but then they want u to buy QT PRO if u wanna watch FULL SCREEN?? hullo...
i think this is not fair....QT FREE should support full screen,ppl interested in the editing features and conversions etc would still upgrade to pro...but FULL SCREEN ??....what the big deal about giving full screen for free?
by the way what player do u guys use for video??
Well, if you have a Mac. Easy thing to do is turn on Zoom in Universal Access, then just zoom in on the area of the window. Basically does fullscreen 
well....IF I HAD A MAC.....hehehe i wish i had a mac....
Then why you wanna use QT on Windows? You can use Media Player Classic to play .Mov files.... in FullScreen !!!
Besides, when I compare QT on mac and QT or win, my personal opinion is QT is win is not as well implemented as mac. It's resource hogger if you ask me.
idiot using a computer???
erm doesnt itunes have a full screen mode? i just watched a movie off it?!
otherwise i'd just use wmp for video, i dont really watch so many off the computer.
Just use VLC media player, it basically plays everything.
(u guys missed the point i guess...)
its not about me,its about apple not offering fullscreen on QT free.......
of course i have media player....
apple's pitch...about QT....goes kinda like...u can do this u can do that,this to that conversion....AND u can watch FULLSCREEN.....
here...
"QUICKTIME PRO
Creat video and produce your own podcasts to share with the world.enjoy the cinematic experience on the web with FULLSCREEN playback and the BRAND NEW FULL SCREEN CONTROLS"
you get sexy bezel controls...
you can access quicktime fullscreen via apple script. quicktime pro features can be accessed by applescript...
Oh quit your whining and stop using caps like there's no tomorrow!
Apple releases things however they damn well please. If the market shows a need for a price adjustment, they do it. Aperture dropped from 500 to 250 because not enough pros were purchasing it. Quicktime has been like this for a LONG LONG TIME. There isn't a market need to offer more Pro features for free, or for less. Quicktime for the average user means viewing a random movie in Internet Explorer, a normal screen event. People who download a large amout of content to watch it full screen pay for Quicktime Pro because they are videophiles.
If you care so much, either pay for it or at least apply a little effort to find alternatives.
dude(gnomexp)....not again....THIS IS NOT ABOUT ME FINDING ALTERNATIVES(unbe please excuse the caps,,,,i have to use it this time bro.)
ok heres an analogy.....suppose WINAMP offers a free player and a pro player....now the pro player has all the editing functionality...AND A VOLUME CONTROL.....the free one doesnt have a VOLUME control....is it justified?
is a volume control just for audiophiles,or a full screen just for videophiles??
thats what im saying...full screen is such a general thing...why charge for it?...include it in the free version....anyway,just wanted to talk about it...unbe please close this thread...no more discussion on this one(at least from my side)
i swear winamp has a volume control in the free ver.
Aqua-Soft Forums