[rel] podXP V1.1

Hi,

podXP V1.1 is available for download ...

Standard Skin

podXP_V1.1Mini.jpg

Bigger ...

BlackVista Skin

podXP_V1.1.BlackVistaMini.jpg

Bigger ...

GlassVista Skin

podXP_V1.1.GlassVistaMini.jpg

Bigger ...

I hope you'll like it ;-) ...

www.podxp.com (in French)

www.podxp.com (Translated by Google)

leFOOL ...

PS : To install a skin, download the .rar skin file and open it. Open the podXP control panel by Ctrl+Alt+P and just DragAndDrop the .podSkinPack on the podXP control panel ...

#355642

Even after reading the translation page and going into some of the sub-links I'm still confused.....what exactly does podxp do?

#355670

it's a widget app. tried it out a couple of months ago and it looked really promising. dl'ing mow...

edit: wow, lefool...this came out really nice. and super low resource usage, thx!

#355687

it's a widget app. tried it out a couple of months ago and it looked really promising. dl'ing mow...

edit: wow, lefool...this came out really nice. and super low resource usage, thx!

shmengie...post a screenie of your podxp setup me old skip!

#355934

sure, when i get home...

#355955

it's a widget app. tried it out a couple of months ago and it looked really promising. dl'ing mow...

edit: wow, lefool...this came out really nice. and super low resource usage, thx!

Promising ideed, but seems dead for about a year; too CPU-intensive tho...

#441766

Nice bumping there Panta, this thread's a year old....

#441775

Promising ideed, but seems dead for about a year; too CPU-intensive tho...

Compared to what? AveDesk then yes. Put it against other similar style programs and you'll find operationally it is the next best app to AveDesk. So, I have to disagree.

While it's been awhile he did update portions of it in late summer. Considering it involves one developer that's not to bad. It is stable and functioning.

I bought DesktopX in early 2006 and saw only two updates in the fall from a commercial developer. Contrary to popular belief most stable, functioning apps aren't updated all that often before the next major release.

#441857

@Panta "CPU-intensive tho."

HA ha ha! this is so nice writen program that on my pc uses most of the time mem 3meg.... and 0% of cpu powert!

PODXP rulez!

#442696

you guys just let it run for a little while. it gets out of control for me.

#442725

Compared to what? AveDesk then yes. Put it against other similar style programs and you'll find operationally it is the next best app to AveDesk. So, I have to disagree.

While it's been awhile he did update portions of it in late summer. Considering it involves one developer that's not to bad. It is stable and functioning.

I bought DesktopX in early 2006 and saw only two updates in the fall from a commercial developer. Contrary to popular belief most stable, functioning apps aren't updated all that often before the next major release.

Yeah, SirSmiley, I was comparing it to AveDesk AND Desktop Sidebar (and even DesktopX)...

As an old software developer - more than 20 years! - I couldn't agree more with you regarding update policy for stable, functioning apps but, as you've said, it's an effort of just one developer, and the last developed "pod" was issued at 05/04/2006 (there is a new skin for this pod issued at 08/05/2006); that's why I said it seems dead for about a year. I just think it should have got either more community engagement or more news from the developer - the last post at the site is the aforementioned skin (just a thought...)

So, why have I said it's too CPU-intensive? Well, after installing it I've started adding pods to it and soon I've reached 47-53% (!!!) of CPU steady consumption by podXP, and I was far from using all of the nice pods shown by lefool at the first post above! (Pentium D 1.73 GHz, 512 MB RAM)

I know I must try it more, but this wasn't a good first trial scenario, was it? For me, it must pass more use-case scenarios (test-cases, to be precise) before issuing a go-don't go opinion...

@ jamon: Good for you, mate! ;)

#442785

Panta, I see your point. Before PodXP he had another similar app that ran amazingly low on resources... if memory serves me correctly it was averaging less than 1mb.

However, it wasn't as customizable and I switched to AveDesk.

#442816

Thanks SirSmiley, it's always a pleasure reading your posts! :)

Let's keep watching podXP and see what comes up in the long term... It'd be nice hearing something from lefool in this thread; I wonder whether he is following it.

#442819