Tagging Redundancy

I thought it was decided a while ago that if you are in (say the) Releases subforum of Wallpapers you don't need a [rel] or [release] tag. Same goes for the Request subform with [req] or [request] tags. isn't it a little redundant, perhaps redundant?

I mean, when I go into the Releases subform of the Icons and Cursors forum, and look for icons, I go there for releases (duh) and all the topics start with [rel], but shouldn't that be a given, especially if I'm already in the Releases subform?

Blah.

// Lou

#343531

yeah, but it helps in another way.

im constantly checking the site, and instead of going to the forums, i just look at the sidebar with the latest posts.

i like to see if it is a release or just a request.

#343534

Yep, tags should go in my opinion, in general.

#343536

I agree that is somewhat redundant but i also like tags.

When you go to "New posts" you can clearly see what is a request thread and what is a release at teh first glance.

Besides people don't bother using tags so most of the tagging is done my me and Pe8er and even those who use tags 50% of the time don't bother posting in the Releases sub-forum.

#343537

Shouldn't you move the topics into the proper subforum if they don't post in the proper subforum? Tagging something and keeping it in the inappropriate spot doesn't help.

// Lou

#343538

Shouldn't you move the topics into the proper subforum if they don't post in the proper subforum? Tagging something and keeping it in the inappropriate spot doesn't help.

// Lou

I DO move them AND tag them ;)

Tagging is a 1 sec job and it helps a lot of people. I don't see the big deal around it.

#343541

The biggest thing to me, is when you're trying to search for something, it greatly aids in finding old threads if they are tagged with a [rel] or [help] or something.

#343544

I think tags are a great help to preview what ure going to read or search, and should not be removed

#343551

The main purpose of tags is to make searching easier. You can use [rel] or [release] as one of keywords - blame Seph, he convinced me it was a good idea :P

#343556

Tags suck.

#343608

tags are a great way of getting ****s banned - which trims down the forum quite nicely :)

#343615

tags are a great way of getting ****s banned - which trims down the forum quite nicely :)

Hey I never thought about it this way... but I think that you may be right :D:D

#343629

i think it would be neat if upon creation of a topic, there could be a selection menu to tag it, and make it so that the user has to pick one of them in order to type out their question.. and of course, if there isn't an applicable tag, then there would be a selection [no tag] as well. .

#343631

tags are a great way of getting ****s banned - which trims down the forum quite nicely :)

Always an optimist ay Tricky? ;)

#343633

tags are a great way of getting ****s banned - which trims down the forum quite nicely :)
GENIUS.

(10 characters...)

#343639

I rather like tags...I've used them as search terms when finding a post.

Personally, I think tags should stay even when the forum makes it clear what kind of post it is.

:)

-NC

#343652

Originally posted by Unbeliever

When you go to "New posts" you can clearly see what is a request thread and what is a release at teh first glance.

Yeah, that's the main reason why I like having the tags, too.

#343668

you can't use rel without the brackets b/c you can't search with short words!!!@!@!

if i want to search for PSP i get "YOUR QUERY IS TOO SHORT FEK JOOO" message :'(

#343963

that is always a pain..... or worse: PNG?!?!!1/

I actually don't have my browser point at the forum anymore. My bookmark is to the new post search.

#344036

Used to be the case, you can now search with 3 character words. :)

#344037

in the words of Arnold

"Stop Whining!" and "Sit Down!"

lol, i had to. Kindergarden Cop best movie never.

#344038