[Ann] Overlocking Mac Mini

Well it didn't take much time to overlock new MAC Mini!! Looks like somebody did it. It's possible to overlock CPU from 1.25 GHz ver. to 1.58 but it works stable only when overlocked to 1.42. It is possible because CPU speed is controlled by jumpers.Anyway it might be a problem while jumpers are very tiny...

Taken from: http://twojepc.pl/news_wiecej.php?id=9318

#251569

I can't see anyone in their right mind - ripping open their brand new MacMini and messing with jumpers to get a 0.2 ghz speed increase.

#251575

I can't see anyone in their right mind - ripping open their brand new MacMini and messing with jumpers to get a 0.2 ghz speed increase.

lol, you sound offended... one of my friends overclocked his 3.8 p4 to 7ghz, but now he has to use liquid nitrogen to cool it :) lol

#251576

hm. looks like fun. although illogical like trickey said

#251586

lol, you sound offended... one of my friends overclocked his 3.8 p4 to 7ghz, but now he has to use liquid hydrogen to cool it :) lol

Yes for a 3.2 ghz increase its well worth it - but would anyone seriously notice a 0.18ghz increase? I think not unless they are so anal that they wouldnt have a MacMini in the first place as they would be running some obscure operating system on their home-made Box.

#251597

well... if you can overclock the 1.25 to 1.42 and it's "stable", then that's kind of like upgrading your low end mac mini to the high end one, minus the extra 40gb. so its kinda like saving $100. but, don't get me wrong, i'd rather spend the extra $100 to keep my warranty, get the real 1.42, and the extra 40gb.

#251599

lol, you sound offended... one of my friends overclocked his 3.8 p4 to 7ghz, but now he has to use liquid hydrogen to cool it :) lol

sure he did kiddo :rolleyes:

Was he using the photon or electron Pentium 11 at 3.4Ghz CPU?

Oh and tell him to use the dark matter cooler. It works on absolute zero so that may help him run that CPU up to 10Ghz!

#251613

Unbe don't be hasty, I heard that it's possible.

#251620

Not worth the risk, unless you're going to get a new Mac. Then it's a good learning opportunity.

#251635

lol, you sound offended... one of my friends overclocked his 3.8 p4 to 7ghz, but now he has to use liquid hydrogen to cool it :) lol

Um. No

(To me: What idiot believed that?)

Have a look at hillbilly technologies p4 at 4GHz. Even Intel says that must be a mistake because the chips can't go that high; very very large timing issues at that frequency, imagine how far light moves at that sort of speed? What is it? 3-4 inches? So physical characteristics of the chip (dimensions) are a very real hurdle. You literrally couldn't get data on and off the bus quick enough - let alone the timing issues between command switching etc.

Some people have no clue how chips work... I mean - why do you think new chips come out to support higher clock speeds? By [your] mentality, I could just go and pick up a 200mhz p3 and overclock it to whatever I liked? Idiot.

There, that's a nice reply for you.

#251637

I thought it sounded like a crock of ****! But I'm no-where technical enough to know 100% - its a good thing some of you guys know the real deal.

#251641

LMFAO@7GHZ. i cant believe you even said that facist hahahahaha

anyways, thats a cool mod, but i personally wouldnt mess with any jumpers that small... looks like asking for trouble

#251652

lol, you sound offended... one of my friends overclocked his 3.8 p4 to 7ghz, but now he has to use liquid hydrogen to cool it :) lol

I really really hope it wasn't hydrogen he used for cooling... there may be a big crater next time you go and visit him :) (maybe nitrogen ?)

#251653

I really really hope it wasn't hydrogen he used for cooling... there may be a big crater next time you go and visit him :) (maybe nitrogen ?)

I don't think the hydrogen is the only funny smelling gas coming from Facists' post...

#251671

I don't think the hydrogen is the only funny smelling gas coming from Facists' post...

FYI, hydrogen don't smell.. it just goes pop when near a naked flame. ;)

#251672

FYI, hydrogen don't smell.. it just goes pop when near a naked flame. ;)

I knew some smart ass would reply to that - well just imagine its Hydrogen sulphate :P for the purpose of the joke

#251679

Hey!! I just wanted to tell U guys that some maniacs already did it!! And it is possible, thats it... I never thought that u're going to chit chat about Chemistry and other stuff :P !! BTW I think it could be a liquid hydrogen. Because it has boiling temp. abut - 252 C degres. So its possible ;) I supose... Am I right?? Kick me if I'm wrong...:)

#251725

*waaa - gangbang* all against me!!! just sayin what he told me!! chill people

#251729

*waaa - gangbang* all against me!!! just sayin what he told me!! chill people

well if ur enough of a fool to believe him, u deserve to be gangbaned :P

#251749

facist, are you sure he overclocked it?

maybe he just got a dual cpu mobo and got another processor?

BTW: :P notice whose country was the first to overclock the mac mini. Eh? Go go polish power.

#251775

facist, are you sure he overclocked it?

maybe he just got a dual cpu mobo and got another processor?

BTW: :P notice whose country was the first to overclock the mac mini. Eh? Go go polish power.

i'm sure, cause i've seen his pc's hard, and theres only one cpu there... and in the sys props it say 7 :slant: o well,who cares

#252051

Well not to continue the off topic crap but I think that 7 ghz is impossible as these people over at Toms Hardware Guide could only go to 4.1 ghz.

I agree with Unbeliver on this one. :D

http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20021216/index.html

And hell yes it is worth overclocking a Mac Mini, just so it can feel "faster" isnt enough. To me numbers matter, wether it runs faster or not. And if its possible to overclock that one it must be possible to overclock the faster one aswell right?

#252189

psssh, my friend purchased his mac mini and overclocked it to 1.5ghz (originall stock 1.25ghz) - there is an article on engadget.com regarding this overclocking. Its just a matter of removing resistors.

#252195

the latest on tomshardware was 5.25 ghz. you are kinda outdated just to let you know :)http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20031230/5ghz-01.html

and it was perfectlly stable at 4.7 ghz

#252206