Was just doing some mockups in photoshop for the new skin, and was putting the avatar on top of each post kinda like how VB3 has it, looks pretty cool, but avatars then will allowed to be a max of 64x64px which is by all means fine with me, but I know you guys are icon whores so your going to want bigger ones 
.
So please let me know yalls thoughts before I go any further with this.
I like big ol' ones. 
Its not the size of your avatar it's how you use it...wait, screw that, Im not letting my huge avatar get shrunk in half!
Ill keep my massive avatar, thank you. 
Originally posted by Alexman2525@Aug 28 2004, 06:32 AMI like big ol' ones.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thats what she said.
I perfer the smaller ones mainly due to them not being as distracting.
big IS better... 
Ignore the design, but in terms of the postbit layout I was talking about.
96x96 would be a compromise - but 64 is too small.
If thats the sort of layout you're thinking of, change my vote to 64x64.
Well I prefer 100x100. but I accept the rules of the forum
Originally posted by Seph@Aug 28 2004, 10:17 AMwow
I wouldnt mind having to have a 64x64 avatar if it was for that design
:woot:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Me niether !!!!!!
I was going to say 128x128, but I wouldn't mind if that is the layout, though.
I have small avatars so I dont care either way.
Whoa-- just saw that mockup :artist: . Change my vote to 64x64 too!
Originally posted by Timan@Aug 28 2004, 04:12 AMIgnore the design, but in terms of the postbit layout I was talking about.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
its a good think he said ignore the design....
it looked too small for me tim....not that size matters :naughty:
Originally posted by grim53@Aug 28 2004, 10:29 PMits a good think he said ignore the design....
it looked too small for me tim....not that size matters :naughty:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I second that! but it looks freakin' awesome
Timan, your design wastes a lot of vertical pixel space, while gaining less
horizontal pixels, if this is to be the header to every post in a thread.
I'd even trade width for height in a new design; see how I'm breaking the lines
in this post to make it more readable - on a 1600x1200 display this sentence
would sprawl over the entire desktop if my browser was maximized. Maybe
considering an automatic break to the width of the add reply box would add
readability but not huge Longhornesque titlebars, IMHO.
my $0.02.
Originally posted by herd@Aug 30 2004, 07:45 AMTiman, your design wastes a lot of vertical pixel space, while gaining less
horizontal pixels, if this is to be the header to every post in a thread.
I'd even trade width for height in a new design; see how I'm breaking the lines
in this post to make it more readable - on a 1600x1200 display this sentence
would sprawl over the entire desktop if my browser was maximized. Maybe
considering an automatic break to the width of the add reply box would add
readability but not huge Longhornesque titlebars, IMHO.
my $0.02.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Some of us are still on 1024x768
the design has nothing to do with this site, i was just showing the layout of the postbit,
Aqua-Soft Forums
