Say I have the following Mac:
1.2 Ghz G4 iBook
786mb Ram
etc etc...
Would Virtual PC smoothly run non-intensive applications? Is there any natural lag in the program just navigating through the OS?
Thank you,
-dav
Say I have the following Mac:
1.2 Ghz G4 iBook
786mb Ram
etc etc...
Would Virtual PC smoothly run non-intensive applications? Is there any natural lag in the program just navigating through the OS?
Thank you,
-dav
Ahahaha.. Is there any natural lag..
Ahahahahaha!
Sorry that's just really funny. I tried running Fedora Core One on my eMac (1GHz G4, 640MB RAM, etc so not too different), and it took about 6-7 seconds to just open a folder.. I didn't dare open an application.. In two words; totally unusable.
Seriously, unless you're willing to work at 5-7% of your normal pace, and pray nothing buggers up - then don't use VPC.
It hurts. ![]()
for non-CPU-intensive tasks, i can't see a reason to run VPC anyway since simple tasks should be convered by little 3rd-party apps written for OS X or otherwise included with the system install, such as textedit, preview, etc.
And some people where actually seriously recommending this for games, lol. Except those people also don't play games in the first place.
Dude you could so play solitaire on VPC. Altho viewing the high score list took 3 seconds to load on my ibook g4 ![]()
Solitare, hardcore! 
Not quite what I meant when I said Games, 
Originally posted by smoke@Jul 18 2004, 08:49 PMAnd some people where actually seriously recommending this for games, lol. Except those people also don't play games in the first place.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It would be quicker to wait for a port of whatever it is..
Anyway there are some excellent freeware games available for the Mac (usually cross-platform).. Like BZFlag, Armagetron (currently addicted to). And plenty of retail ones.. Must. Buy. UT2004.