[request] Bayesian Filter For Thunderbird

Im lookin for a Bayesian filter for Thunderbird. Does anyone know of one?

#174369

http://texturizer.net/thunderbird/faq.html#q2.4

i think it comes with bayesian filtering. Alternatively, setup spamassasin.

#174427

Please use tags. This is a [Request]

-------------------------

The Topic Has Been Tagged

// Seph

#174461

no its not, its a question, unless he was asking someone to write a filter for him?

#174654

Well, i was thinking more along the lines of him requesting links for a bayesian filter.

A question tag goes more with things like "[question] Is objectbar a heavy on resources app?"

It is only a matter of perception anyway ;)

#174657

which is why these tags are pointless ;-)

#174689

People seem to like them though :P

#174697

that just proves most aqua-soft users are stupid! :P

*goes to hide from the mob*

#174704

Thunderbird already has it built in - Tools -> Junk mail controls -> Adaptive filter tab -> check the box!

Works very well :)

Originally posted by Seph

..:::::::::::::::::::::::::Have you hugged a Moderator today?:::::::::::::::::::::::..

/me hugs Seph.

/me runs away to shower, quickly :P

#174721

Thanx Viper. I did have it set up. Not thats is mission critical but do you know if it a bayesian filter. Everything Ive read says its one of the best.

#174798

Originally posted by MetalMusicAddict@Jun 9 2004, 04:07 PM

Thanx Viper. I did have it set up. Not thats is mission critical but do you know if it a bayesian filter. Everything Ive read says its one of the best.

Beyesian filters actually aren't the best anymore. Beyesian filters work by analyzing the presence of certain words that are in junk mail. These words become associated with spam. Unfortunately spammers have managed to get around this by putting random words in their email. This completely breaks the statistics. Also, if your friends like to talk about Viagra a lot, you'll have problems.

Yes, Thunderbird uses a Beyesian Filter, so it's not as accurate as a multi-method approach that DSPAM and SpamAssassin use. SpamAssassin uses Beyesian, tokens, online verification, and a variety of methods. Together, it produces very nice filtering.

But I switched from SpamAssassin to Thunderbird's Beyesian Filter (long story), and it seems to catch my minimal amount (about 20 a day) of spam just fine. It has a much higher false positive ratio though, so I do have to check my junk filter every once in a while.

If you want to set up and try spamassassin, you need a mail program that can pipe messages out (or you need to get the person that runs your mail server to use it on their side). I dont know if SA works in Windows, or how well. Thunderbird/Mozilla can not pipe to spamassassin (which is why I switched), but Evolution (for *nix) can. I wrote a tutorial on SpamAssassin at gooeylinux.

#174804