[suggestion] Rules On The Size Of Sigs?

Hi All,

Would it be possible to review the size of signatures that are acceptable on the forum? lately, I've been noticing some pretty big (and frankly irrelevant) sigs. I know you can turn them off, but I'd like to continue being able to identify members by their avatar & sig.

I'm not sure what everyone's take is on this topic but I thought an open debate might help in clarifying (or redefining) the guidelines?

#156773

That's coming in the new rules.

We're going to actively enforce 400px wide/100px high as a maximum.

Anything over that (even if it's spread across multiple images) will be removed.

#156776

Yeah, some are getting too big. What do you think is a good size? Mine is 600x100 I think.

#156779

Originally posted by wizard@May 5 2004, 01:46 PM

Yeah, some are getting too big. What do you think is a good size? Mine is 600x100 I think.

tad too big, causes a rendering issue with the forum for 800x600 users ;)

#156794

Is 400 the widest you can go? I just looked at the canvus, it's to skinny. That will wipe out everyones pictures.

#156798

Originally posted by wizard@May 5 2004, 07:04 PM

Is 400 the widest you can go? I just looked at the canvus, it's to skinny. That will wipe out everyones pictures.

Not everyones, mine is 455x50 :lol:

I think its for the best purple prince

#156800

:lol:

Will we be able to align them (left, centered, right)?

#156803

what about 500px?

#156805

mine is fiiiii-hiiine :P

#156806

I actually think that the combined height of the image and text in Sephs sig is pretty much the ideal size for the board. Wizards is great, but a bit too tall.

#156841

ok his signature graphic* is still to wide. (edited because of the sick minds :moon: )

#156846

Originally posted by Ludge@May 5 2004, 10:49 PM

I actually think that the combined height of the image and text in Sephs sig is pretty much the ideal size for the board. Wizards is great, but a bit too tall.

He da man!... listen to him people, he drives a tractor and knows the truth about a good sig ^_^

Admins can still warn java script:emoticon(':6')

java script:emoticon(':6')

#156847

LOL Seph's been editted!

(how does it feel?)

But smaller sigs are good.

I think Timan's suggestion of 500 is reasonable.

(guess my one'll be too huge then)

#158307

Oh boy. This got me going, a sig larger than the actual post...

Linkage

Will the new rules come into force with IPB 2 or sooner?

#158313

I'm going to start making wild assumptions here, and say that my sig is probably way too big and I'm going to get a *****y email from Seph about it :naughty:

#158323

Originally posted by Simon@May 7 2004, 02:31 PM

I'm going to start making wild assumptions here, and say that my sig is probably way too big and I'm going to get a *****y email from Seph about it  :naughty:

nope your gonna get something from me for not having timmys name in it :canadian:

#158336

But you're not off-topicey enough. Some people might consider that one of your many better qualities :Dsucking up>

/me finishes sucking up to Timan

Edited for Seph's benefit. :6

#158351

Originally posted by Simon@May 7 2004, 11:07 PM

But you're not off-topicey enough. Some people might consider that one of your many better qualities  :D

/me finishes sucking up to Timan

The worst part is that i dont remember seeing you start the Sucking up statement... that can only mean that you have been sucking up to him for more than a year... i cry for you :cry:

#158360

500px sounds good to me, I'm pretty sure most of mine have been about that wide in the past.

#158378

Originally posted by Ludge@May 7 2004, 06:10 PM

Oh boy. This got me going, a sig larger than the actual post...

Linkage

Will the new rules come into force with IPB 2 or sooner?

I gotta admit this one gets me going everytime I see it and it used to be bigger!

Im a regular visitor to another premium board (:o yes another board!) and they are a bit more lenient on signature rules and more than half the page gets filled up with signatures and I always make sure signatures are off but to be honest they dont bother me on this board I think people just need to limit thier signature as much as possible.

#158451

Like me :rolleyes: :smartass:

#158456

There you go Seph, I've edited my original post for your benefit :rolleyes::P

#158626

I think 500px wide is fine, its mainly the height that concerns me (what with all the scrolling you have to do on the ss thread! :lol:)

Also as Ludge pointed out many people aren't just using pics in their sigs but text (some more than others! why on earth someone would want to include the nitty-gritty of their setup in each and every post is beyond me!), maybe we need a rule that reflects this i.e 100px height or equivalent when combined with text? :dunno:

#158683

All sigs should be 152x40 bearing contents as illustrated below:

#158702

I think a perfect size for sigs would be 500x150 at most.

And don't complain about my sigs image, I am going to change the size of it sometime.

#159330