Aqua-Soft Forums: Ripper: daniel0619 on deviantart - Aqua-Soft Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Ripper: daniel0619 on deviantart Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   liquival Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 665
  • Joined: 22-February 06

Posted 10 October 2007 - 05:20 AM

http://daniel0619.deviantart.com/

he has ripped icons by Trazo and an avetunes skin by perfumeNK.
0

#2 User is offline   gnomexp Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2,360
  • Joined: 15-July 04

Posted 10 October 2007 - 05:25 AM

He at least links them.

Reported both as DevART violations. I suggest you do the same.
0

#3 User is offline   @ceroy Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 434
  • Joined: 03-January 05

Posted 10 October 2007 - 07:18 AM

Hee lol.. You made a grave mistake.. http://daniel0619.de...com/favourites/
You know.. Fav, like many other ;)
0

#4 User is offline   farout49 Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 265
  • Joined: 29-July 03

Posted 10 October 2007 - 07:46 AM

Yeah it's a mistake :cool:
0

#5 User is offline   Dream_Team Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 910
  • Joined: 31-March 04

Posted 10 October 2007 - 10:51 AM

Nah no grave mistake.
This should be closed, the deviations are deleted (they were 15 minutes after the thread was started) and dissapeard while I was reporting them.
0

#6 User is offline   gnomexp Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2,360
  • Joined: 15-July 04

Posted 14 October 2007 - 05:08 AM

User is ripping again.

Report away.
0

#7 User is offline   Ertai88 Icon

  • Group: News Posters
  • Posts: 1,112
  • Joined: 25-March 06

Posted 14 October 2007 - 11:51 PM

him on his deviantART Journal said:

Everything I have posted, I got somewhere else, from someone else, ect... I will give credit to everyone by a link to where I got it from. And the reason for this is that I think their stuff is good enough to repost. So feel lucky if I have reposted it, but if the original author has a problem, I will be gladly handle it in a professional manner. Otherwise, keep your ripping comments to yourself.

Pfft..
0

#8 User is offline   gnomexp Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2,360
  • Joined: 15-July 04

Posted 15 October 2007 - 12:54 AM

Again, please everyone login and report his stuff as copyright infringement.
0

#9 User is offline   Addiction Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 193
  • Joined: 28-February 07

Posted 15 October 2007 - 03:07 AM

Think the account has been deleted, :D hahaha

EDIT: it hasn't been :(
0

#10 User is offline   blaugrana-tez Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 50
  • Joined: 27-July 06

Posted 15 October 2007 - 10:28 AM

+1 reports
0

#11 User is offline   shmengie Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2,929
  • Joined: 31-August 03

Posted 15 October 2007 - 01:52 PM

i don't get it. he'd not claiming authorship. he's linking to things he likes and gives full credit. how is that ripping?
0

#12 User is offline   Dream_Team Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 910
  • Joined: 31-March 04

Posted 15 October 2007 - 04:48 PM

Repost another one's work : Ripping.
Even if you link to the original ones and say it in the description, most people will not read it.
0

#13 User is offline   shmengie Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2,929
  • Joined: 31-August 03

Posted 15 October 2007 - 04:59 PM

okay, guess us old guys use the dictionary definition of ripping. i.e.: ripping off, stealing. like if i posted a wall you made and said that i made it. so, i still don't get it. this daniel guy found some icons he likes. he says, 'hey, i like these. here's the guy who did them and here's his devart page.' if you guys consider that ripping, you're as bad as the riaa. seriously. so, the concept of 'links' on the internet should go away? what about quotes? what about fair use?

what about: maybe trazo is happy to have others like his work and link to his page? anybody ask trazo what he thinks?
0

#14 User is offline   SirSmiley Icon

  • Douchebag
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1,885
  • Joined: 28-June 05

Posted 15 October 2007 - 06:14 PM

yeah, have to agree with shmengie on this one. Just a few issues or really differences in opinion.

IMO he should of just posted the screenshot with a link to the specific feature and a told people to fav the original artists' work (not that everyone does this). Of course if the original is down then maybe an upload is fine. In a way he's stealing fav/download counts from another deviant

If you don't have a paid account this is basically the only option to sort of feature a deviant's work that you really respect.
0

#15 User is offline   metallicamaster3 Icon

  • Group: News Posters
  • Posts: 2,184
  • Joined: 07-January 07

Posted 15 October 2007 - 08:36 PM

reported.
0

#16 User is offline   gnomexp Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2,360
  • Joined: 15-July 04

Posted 16 October 2007 - 12:44 AM

The author of the AveDesk desklet SPECIFICALLY requested he remove it, but he "hid the comment".
0

#17 User is offline   liquival Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 665
  • Joined: 22-February 06

Posted 16 October 2007 - 01:38 AM

@Shmengie: Trazo's been offline for 3 weeks.
0

#18 User is offline   shmengie Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2,929
  • Joined: 31-August 03

Posted 16 October 2007 - 01:48 PM

gnomexp;476705 said:

The author of the AveDesk desklet SPECIFICALLY requested he remove it, but he "hid the comment".

i assume you're talking about perfumenk, right? why would he request that? how could anyone ever find anything without someone, somewhere linking to it. isn't 99.9% of the internet following links? perfumenk should get down on all fours and kiss daniel's feet for thinking enough of his work to link to him.

having said that, of course daniel should remove the link, if asked. what a d1ck!
0

#19 User is offline   Markoz Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 468
  • Joined: 23-June 07

Posted 19 October 2007 - 08:34 PM

The user removed the ripped deviations. ;)
0

#20 User is offline   rjohnstone Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1,762
  • Joined: 11-November 02

Posted 19 October 2007 - 08:39 PM

CanasX;477069 said:

The user removed the ripped deviations. ;)

It's only considered "ripped" if you try and claim it as your own work. ;)

Clearly not the case here.

There's a difference between Linking or even Hosting copies of other people's work and claiming the work is your own.

So everyone needs to step off of their almighty pedestals and get over it already.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic