Aqua-Soft Forums: Avatar Sizes - Aqua-Soft Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Avatar Sizes Rate Topic: -----

Poll: Avatar Sizes (59 member(s) have cast votes)

  1. 64x64 ( half the size ) (18 votes [31.58%])

    Percentage of vote: 31.58%

  2. 128x128 ( what we have now ) (39 votes [68.42%])

    Percentage of vote: 68.42%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Timan Icon

  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 4,741
  • Joined: 08-November 02

Posted 28 August 2004 - 06:31 AM

Was just doing some mockups in photoshop for the new skin, and was putting the avatar on top of each post kinda like how VB3 has it, looks pretty cool, but avatars then will allowed to be a max of 64x64px which is by all means fine with me, but I know you guys are icon whores so your going to want bigger ones :P.

So please let me know yalls thoughts before I go any further with this.
0

#2 User is offline   Alexman2525 Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 305
  • Joined: 21-November 03

Posted 28 August 2004 - 06:32 AM

I like big ol' ones. :D
0

#3 User is offline   deadzombie Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1,215
  • Joined: 19-April 03

Posted 28 August 2004 - 06:58 AM

Its not the size of your avatar it's how you use it...wait, screw that, Im not letting my huge avatar get shrunk in half!

Ill keep my massive avatar, thank you. ;)
0

#4 User is offline   deadzombie Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1,215
  • Joined: 19-April 03

Posted 28 August 2004 - 06:58 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Alexman2525@Aug 28 2004, 06:32 AM
I like big ol' ones.  :D
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Thats what she said.
0

#5 User is offline   kjwebb Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 256
  • Joined: 11-June 03

Posted 28 August 2004 - 07:23 AM

I perfer the smaller ones mainly due to them not being as distracting.
0

#6 User is offline   Tobbz Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 381
  • Joined: 07-January 03

Posted 28 August 2004 - 07:33 AM

big IS better... :)
0

#7 User is offline   Timan Icon

  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 4,741
  • Joined: 08-November 02

Posted 28 August 2004 - 09:12 AM

Ignore the design, but in terms of the postbit layout I was talking about.
0

#8 User is offline   Seph Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 6,983
  • Joined: 15-May 03

Posted 28 August 2004 - 09:17 AM

wow

I wouldnt mind having to have a 64x64 avatar if it was for that design :o :woot:
0

#9 User is offline   castroman Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 3,472
  • Joined: 21-July 03

Posted 28 August 2004 - 09:22 AM

128X128 the best, 64x64 is too small.


/aviel
0

#10 User is offline   Tricky Icon

  • Group: Subscribers
  • Posts: 1,343
  • Joined: 10-November 03

Posted 28 August 2004 - 09:31 AM

96x96 would be a compromise - but 64 is too small.
0

#11 User is offline   Ludge Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1,229
  • Joined: 03-June 03

Posted 28 August 2004 - 10:10 AM

If thats the sort of layout you're thinking of, change my vote to 64x64.
0

#12 User is offline   Earkez Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 218
  • Joined: 27-March 04

Posted 28 August 2004 - 10:12 AM

Well I prefer 100x100. but I accept the rules of the forum ;)
0

#13 User is offline   Hobbes Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1,795
  • Joined: 31-May 04

Posted 28 August 2004 - 11:10 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Seph@Aug 28 2004, 10:17 AM
wow

I wouldnt mind having to have a 64x64 avatar if it was for that design :o :woot:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Me niether !!!!!!
0

#14 User is offline   wizard Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 4,351
  • Joined: 07-January 03

Posted 28 August 2004 - 07:27 PM

I was going to say 128x128, but I wouldn't mind if that is the layout, though.
0

#15 User is offline   juno Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1,872
  • Joined: 01-August 03

Posted 28 August 2004 - 07:34 PM

I have small avatars so I dont care either way.
0

#16 User is offline   liquidplasmaflow Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1,523
  • Joined: 11-July 03

Posted 28 August 2004 - 07:44 PM

Whoa-- just saw that mockup :artist: . Change my vote to 64x64 too!
0

#17 User is offline   LoofyGun Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 690
  • Joined: 20-April 03

Posted 28 August 2004 - 07:51 PM

Small avatars all the way. Dunno what it is, the 128px ones are just annoying imo.

:rolleyes:
0

#18 User is offline   grim53 Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1,854
  • Joined: 01-June 03

Posted 28 August 2004 - 08:29 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Timan@Aug 28 2004, 04:12 AM
Ignore the design, but in terms of the postbit layout I was talking about.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


its a good think he said ignore the design....
it looked too small for me tim....not that size matters :naughty:
0

#19 User is offline   ont Icon

  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 109
  • Joined: 02-November 03

Posted 28 August 2004 - 08:34 PM

Quote

Originally posted by grim53@Aug 28 2004, 10:29 PM
its a good think he said ignore the design....
it looked too small for me tim....not that size matters  :naughty:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


I second that! but it looks freakin' awesome :D
0

#20 User is offline   herd Icon

  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 999
  • Joined: 02-November 03

Posted 30 August 2004 - 11:45 AM

Timan, your design wastes a lot of vertical pixel space, while gaining less
horizontal pixels, if this is to be the header to every post in a thread.

I'd even trade width for height in a new design; see how I'm breaking the lines
in this post to make it more readable - on a 1600x1200 display this sentence
would sprawl over the entire desktop if my browser was maximized. Maybe
considering an automatic break to the width of the add reply box would add
readability but not huge Longhornesque titlebars, IMHO.

my $0.02.
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users